|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Nov 25, 2005 22:41:57 GMT -5
What is Blount's future going to be after being benched the entire game by Rivers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Celtic17 on Nov 25, 2005 22:49:39 GMT -5
Blount is an unhappy role player, off the bench.
He should be traded asap, but no team jumps and we are stuck with the sob for the season.
Ainge adds Banks or Allen to the trade and we move Bludder.
We might need to toss in cash and/or a 2nd rounder, to make it happen.
I'm willing to pay - to move his sad azz.
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Nov 25, 2005 22:55:07 GMT -5
He and Malik Rose make close to the same amount, except Rose's contract ends in 2 years. He's a tough rebounder, despite being undersized.
But one problem is that he plays for the Knicks. So far, Ainge has not made a trade with anyone in the same division as us, and I'm not sure if he's likely to do so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Celtic17 on Nov 25, 2005 23:03:40 GMT -5
I would like to see the Celts bigs play against Blow-hard every game...
|
|
|
|
Post by eja117 on Nov 26, 2005 11:30:35 GMT -5
I think it is about as hard to trade Blount right now as it was to trade Derrick Coleman if he hadn't been as talented. Unhappy, lazy player with big contract = nearly untradeable, unless it's for a similar player
|
|
|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Nov 26, 2005 12:34:14 GMT -5
hope to see him gone, afraid to see him back in starting unit. his place is on the pine
|
|
cfoo
Welcome To Celtics Green!
Posts: 1
|
Post by cfoo on Nov 26, 2005 13:05:53 GMT -5
I wish we could trade him for someone that would at least try. I mean Scalabrine is bad, but at least he gives effort out there. You cant have guys just giving up easy lanes to the basket and refusing to hustle for boards out there.
|
|
