|
|
Post by Celtic17 on Oct 2, 2005 14:29:39 GMT -5
B.Jones was one of the top defenders in the league, if not the top. He could score a solid 14 - 18 for you each night too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roadrunner on Oct 2, 2005 22:25:11 GMT -5
In comparison to teams, hard to compare teams of the 60's to the 80's to the '90s. Reason - the rules, regulations, expansion of the league make it impossible to make a fair comparison. Example - the Celtics, Lakers in the '80s had very deep team; because of expansion, teams are much thinner and have 1-2superstars surrounded by 10 role players.
|
|
|
|
Post by eja117 on Oct 3, 2005 15:54:12 GMT -5
In general I'm going to say no. I'd think the most dominant teams would be teams that dominated for years, then you pick a year where they were at their best, so maybe the Bulls that first year after MJ got back, or the Celts in the middle of the 60s. Teams that seem completely invincible. The 80s Celts don't seem invincible, cause the Lakers were always in their side. The same thing for the Lakers, seeing as how the Celts were always beating them. But I do think you can make an argument that had either of those teams played the 90s Bulls or 60s Celts wouldn't have seemed so invincible.
|
|
