Post by ferbo on Aug 30, 2007 7:02:06 GMT -5
Yesterday there was a column posted in News which downplayed Ainge's deals over the summer because they represented "Plan B", him having to achieve Plan A.
In any kind of management, Plan B is a reality. Neither life nor business offers an unlimited supply of Plan A. SOMETIME the best thing to do then is to do nothing. But most of the time, the decision maker has to look for Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, etc., cetc.
So I think that article off the mark.
Another thing: A frequent comment is that Ainge has suddenly changed directions and moved away from a "developing young players" model. Maybe so, maybe not. Remember this is a guy whom Kevin McHale said is a "bad Mormon" who would cheat in a father-sone softball game. He was accumulating talent. He talked about devloping the young players. The only rumblings of the future came from others who were observing that Ainge was going to have difficulty signing all the young talent to their next contract. There has been an underlying premise developing that he would have to decide who to keep and trade the others.
Well, that is whaat he did.
Were his deals "good" deals? We'll have to wait to see.
In addition to the big deals, he has signed some folks:
House replaces, say, Allen Ray.
Pollard replaces Kandyman.
Posey replaces Gomes, which is a significant upgrade.
So those losses are replaced.
Pruitt will replace the gun-carrier.
Davis is like having the equivalent of one of those first-round draft choices now--not a totally far-fetched idea given that those choies don't look to be high ones.
Personally I think he has replaced all his losses through trading, getting the two Hal of Famers to start and the other guys off the bench.
And he clearly has changed some dynamic, by making the Cs appeaar to be a place which FAs are eager to check out.
That's how I see it.
In any kind of management, Plan B is a reality. Neither life nor business offers an unlimited supply of Plan A. SOMETIME the best thing to do then is to do nothing. But most of the time, the decision maker has to look for Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, etc., cetc.
So I think that article off the mark.
Another thing: A frequent comment is that Ainge has suddenly changed directions and moved away from a "developing young players" model. Maybe so, maybe not. Remember this is a guy whom Kevin McHale said is a "bad Mormon" who would cheat in a father-sone softball game. He was accumulating talent. He talked about devloping the young players. The only rumblings of the future came from others who were observing that Ainge was going to have difficulty signing all the young talent to their next contract. There has been an underlying premise developing that he would have to decide who to keep and trade the others.
Well, that is whaat he did.
Were his deals "good" deals? We'll have to wait to see.
In addition to the big deals, he has signed some folks:
House replaces, say, Allen Ray.
Pollard replaces Kandyman.
Posey replaces Gomes, which is a significant upgrade.
So those losses are replaced.
Pruitt will replace the gun-carrier.
Davis is like having the equivalent of one of those first-round draft choices now--not a totally far-fetched idea given that those choies don't look to be high ones.
Personally I think he has replaced all his losses through trading, getting the two Hal of Famers to start and the other guys off the bench.
And he clearly has changed some dynamic, by making the Cs appeaar to be a place which FAs are eager to check out.
That's how I see it.