|
Post by eja117 on Apr 15, 2006 8:59:32 GMT -5
I'm not sure if Raef is here another 3 or 4 years. 3 I think. I think the answer is obvious.
|
|
|
Post by FLCeltsFan on Apr 15, 2006 13:47:41 GMT -5
I have to say Scal. He may not be a very good player but he is a good locker room guy and a good teammate and his deal isn't that bad... Raef's deal is terrible and he isn't the best team player as can be seen by his grumbling to the press this year.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2006 13:59:55 GMT -5
Scal. Easier to dispose.
|
|
|
Post by freshnthehouse on Apr 15, 2006 16:47:34 GMT -5
JHVOS has got it right. A 3mill a year contract in the NBA is peanuts. They are used as trade throw-ins to make slaries equal out. The other we gotta remember is that Scala's last year is a team option for 3.5 mill. We def. wont pick it up. So we are really on the hook for 3 years, not 4.
|
|
|
Post by freshnthehouse on Apr 15, 2006 16:48:53 GMT -5
Oh yeah, and kudos to Eja for starting these posts. Now that the seasons basically over, we need topics like this to keep us talking C's. Nice work.
|
|
|
Post by The Eye of the Q is upon you! on Apr 16, 2006 8:59:35 GMT -5
Raef can get you 15 pts, 8 rebs, 2 block shots, and 3 asts on a good night. Trouble is, if his 3 point shot isn't falling, he is useless.
Scrubbabrine is an insurance policy. Nothing more, nothing less. Scrubby has better NBA value because of his salary.
|
|