|
Post by Roadrunner on Jan 24, 2006 23:42:25 GMT -5
Swift, not sure. I like Perks alot, esp his work ethic. I think Perks is going to be a better "c" than most people think. Guy is 2-3 years removed from HS.
|
|
|
Post by The Eye of the Q is upon you! on Jan 24, 2006 23:57:36 GMT -5
If we trade Blount and Banks to Seattle - Not sure why we would, It would be for expiring contracts. Flip Murray and Potapenko come to mind along with Robert Swift. I would rather get Nick Colison.
|
|
|
Post by mev17 on Jan 25, 2006 3:00:47 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind Colison being our third big behind Al and Perk. Would make a terrific three-man rotation. But I've read nothing to suggest Nick Colison is on the block.
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jan 25, 2006 3:33:16 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't think Collison is on the block (neither is Robert Swift, for that matter). Something's got to happen. Just trade Blount already. I don't care who we get back in return. As long as he doesn't play for us again. We are so much better with him out of the lineup.
|
|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Jan 25, 2006 11:26:05 GMT -5
Swift, not sure. I like Perks alot, esp his work ethic. I think Perks is going to be a better "c" than most people think. Guy is 2-3 years removed from HS. amen!!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2006 17:28:13 GMT -5
We aren't getting Swift nor Collison for Blount/Banks. It's gonna end up being someone who probably be irrevlant to this team like Yogi Stewart. Hopefully someone with a short contract so we're not tied up on the salary cap.
|
|