|
|
Post by jmost on Jun 18, 2017 18:05:47 GMT -5
No, not for a rental. If on the other hand he would sign an extension for 4-5 years ...
The Lakers probably don't want to give up anything for a guy they could get for nothing in the near future.
|
|
|
|
Post by eja117 on Jun 18, 2017 19:14:50 GMT -5
No, not for a rental. If on the other hand he would sign an extension for 4-5 years ... The Lakers probably don't want to give up anything for a guy they could get for nothing in the near future. I was kinda thinking if the team were doing really well and seemed like a threat to the Cavs maybe a half year rental at the deadline for a couple 2nds or something |
|
|
|
Post by jmost on Jun 18, 2017 19:49:26 GMT -5
No, not for a rental. If on the other hand he would sign an extension for 4-5 years ... The Lakers probably don't want to give up anything for a guy they could get for nothing in the near future. I was kinda thinking if the team were doing really well and seemed like a threat to the Cavs maybe a half year rental at the deadline for a couple 2nds or something For sure if that's all it would take. Absolutely. We're going to have so many first round picks in the next few years that I don't know how any second rounder is gonna stick with us, so in a situation like that, why not? |
|
|
|
Post by eja117 on Jun 18, 2017 19:52:55 GMT -5
If I remember correctly IT only cost like a first or something. I don't see why on Earth we'd give anything of value for a guy gone in a few months.
|
|
|
|
Post by FLCeltsFan on Jun 18, 2017 21:15:23 GMT -5
I'm reading that the Cavs are trying to get PG also. I can't see them having the assets to make a deal. But there are going to be quite a few bidders and it will take more than a couple of seconds to get it done.
|
|
