|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2017 20:36:09 GMT -5
What is it about Fultz that concerns you?
If Ainge passes on Fultz, what would the reason(s) be?
|
|
|
|
Post by eja117 on Jun 15, 2017 20:42:16 GMT -5
Very little concerns me. I'm concerned we need bigs way more than guards. If we trade down I think it would be more like when Red traded Joe Barry Carrol (1rst pick) for Parish and the 3rd pick (McHale)
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2017 23:47:29 GMT -5
Buy it's not good practice to pass up on a superstar. If Ainge passes up on Fultz, that sort of tells us he wasn't fully sold on him, doesn't it?
To me, if there's one concern, it's the apparent lack of an inner drive, the win at all cost attitude. It's not clear to me that he has this, it's kinda cloudy (whereas you see this attribute more readily in Josh Jackson).
|
|
|
|
Post by Roadrunner on Jun 16, 2017 22:49:49 GMT -5
Fultz can shoot, average defense and Danny prefers players that can't shoot, above average defense. Bradley, Smart, Rozier, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 17, 2017 3:57:54 GMT -5
I'm still bothered by his cool attitude. Duncan was the same way, so it's not like Markelle has no chance to be great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roadrunner on Jun 17, 2017 15:11:02 GMT -5
The reason Ainge passes on Fultz is most likely he does not think Fultz is the transcendent player, and swapping the selection for another high selection, and excellent assets (multiple top 5 selections) is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 17, 2017 15:40:09 GMT -5
The reason Ainge passes on Fultz is most likely he does not think Fultz is the transcendent player, and swapping the selection for another high selection, and excellent assets (multiple top 5 selections) is better. Yeah, I'm thinking this too. |
|
