|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Jun 15, 2005 4:14:24 GMT -5
i stand for what i say ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2005 4:17:59 GMT -5
Hey, if this guy turns out to be a fantastic player in the NBA (especially if he ends up playing for us), you can consider yourself to be the one of the first guys--if not the first guy--to bring his name up. Just like saying you discovered Michael Jordan. This could be your claim to fame, BC ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Jun 15, 2005 4:21:32 GMT -5
i could care less about fame, but i'd definitely like the celts to draft this guy
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2005 4:26:19 GMT -5
Well, if the Lakers fall on their faces, and the Cavs do too, we could have 2 lottery picks next year. Who knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by eddietours on Jun 15, 2005 5:41:01 GMT -5
so if it comes down to rudy or sergio who you pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by VI_CelticsFan on Jun 15, 2005 8:21:54 GMT -5
so if it comes down to rudy or sergio who you pick. I'd definately pick sergio rodriguez. He looks like he's going to be good. Who'd you pick eddie? |
|
|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Jun 15, 2005 9:08:31 GMT -5
definitely sergio. i have said it several times - we have enough sg's already. rudy is a sg not a pg
|
|
|
|
Post by eddietours on Jun 15, 2005 12:55:27 GMT -5
i would have to go with rudy because i got to see rudy play againts the us team but sergio looks greate in the video
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2005 22:00:09 GMT -5
Yeah, the guy is flashy. He's got some creativity running through his body. But I gotta wonder how many of those passes will get deflected or stolen in the NBA. And I'd say 90% of his dribble penetrations ended up on the right side.
But considering the guy is only 17 years old, he's pretty impressive as a playmaker. Definitely the european version of a young Jayson Williams (in his Sacramento days).
|
|
|
|
Post by meltinjohn on Jun 15, 2005 22:57:56 GMT -5
Sergio does look good no doubt. Huh? Danny doesn't have the lakers and cavs picks both does he? I still have no clue which one management dealt to get Walker. Was it next years celtic pick? Was it the cavs pick? Was it the laker pick? Now I'm hoping it was the laker pick because Phil is back there now and they may not be a 25 win team. More like 41-41 while cleveland can be way lesser.
|
|
|
|
Post by DERRENMATTS on Jun 15, 2005 23:59:00 GMT -5
If I understand the trade correctly, we owe the Hawks the worst of our 1st round picks. Since I don't think the Lakers or the Cavs will do better than us next year, we'll be surrendering our pick to them.
|
|
|
|
Post by BCHISTORIAN on Jun 16, 2005 1:29:00 GMT -5
If I understand the trade correctly, we owe the Hawks the worst of our 1st round picks. that's exactly how it is! and all the picks are lotto protected until 2007 when we have to give our worst pick - lotto or not |
|
|
|
Post by meltinjohn on Jun 17, 2005 23:00:55 GMT -5
The laker pick goes 41-41, lets say clevelands is 30-52. Those are still good picks. I wonder if its lottery protected also assuming the lakers and cavs make the playoffs. Its lottery protected on the lakers end and top 5 next year I think. It could just be the worst one. Anyways, Danny can still let Walker go for nothing and get a pick back that could be lottery material with dealing Pierce so its like that pick to get Walker was never traded.
|
|
